Judge loses $54 million pants lawsuit

I'm so glad that he lost. This was just a huge waste of time and taxpayer dollars. Now instead of taking the replacement pants as offered, he has to pay court costs, and still out his pants! Wonder if he has to pay the $100,000 legal fees on the defendants part?

It cost about $5,000 to try the case. The judges argument was that the dry cleaner's sign, "Satisfaction Guaranteed" was misleading the customers? Is this correct?

No comments: